|
| |
National Vaccine Information Center
www.NVIC.org
Human Papilloma Virus Vaccine
Safety
Analysis of Vaccine Adverse
Events Reporting System Reports:
Adverse Reactions, Concerns and Implications
On June 8th 2006, the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) announced the approval of GARDASIL, and on June 29th the
Advisory Committee on Immunizations Practices (ACIP) voted to recommend adding
GARDASIL human papilloma virus vaccine to the Centers for Disease Control's
national childhood recommended immunization schedule. On July 14th the first
report of a serious reaction to the vaccine was filed with the federal Vaccine
Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).
A 16-year-old Illinois girl was vaccinated July 7th and 13 days later developed
symptoms eventually diagnosed as Guillian-Barre Syndrome. A 14-year-old girl in
the District of Columbia was vaccinated on July 11th and complained of severe
pain immediately following the injection, fell off the examining table and
experienced a 10 to 15 second fainting spell ending up in the emergency room
with a headache and speech problems. The report of this reaction, the first in
the nation, was filed on July 14th, 15 days after the ACIP vote.
Six months later, 82 reports of GARDASIL
reactions have been submitted to VAERS on behalf of at least 84 young girls and
2 boys.[1] Reaction reports have come in from 21 states and the District of
Columbia.[2] Reactions were reported for children and young adults ranging in
age from 11 to 27. Of the reports indicating what day the vaccine was given and
the reaction occurred, 63 percent stated that the reaction occurred the same day
the vaccine was given. All but three of the reports were for reactions that
occurred within one week of vaccination.
This document is divided into three sections. The
first section describes reaction reports for a number of reported adverse
events: neurological symptoms including syncopal episodes and seizures,
arthralgia and joint pain, Guillian-Barre Syndrome, and other immunological
reactions. The second section addresses concerns related to vaccinating
individuals already infected with HPV. The last section discusses issues that
need to be addressed by government regulators and the manufacturer and
considerations for clinicians and consumers.
Reported Adverse Events
Presumably, the reactions described below
occurred after the first dose of GARDASIL. GARDASIL is given in a three-dose
series. None of the reports stated that the children and adults experiencing
problems had previously been vaccinated with GARDASIL.
Syncopal Episodes and Seizures.
One-quarter of all reports filed after GARDASIL vaccination were for neurologic
adverse events including loss of consciousness, syncope, syncopal events and
seizures. An additional five reports included symptoms of dizziness and feeling
faint.
Syncope is defined as a temporary suspension of
consciousness due to generalized cerebral ischemia (inadequate blood flow and
lack of oxygen). The reports of syncopal episodes and their descriptions are
remarkable. A physician from Washington State reported that in one morning,
three patients experienced syncopal episodes. On August 8th another physician's
office reported that two patients experienced syncopal episodes on the same day.
Although these reports did not detail what
happened to the individuals experiencing these syncopal episodes, other reports
did. The 14-year-old DC girl mentioned earlier experienced a syncopal episode
combined with amblyopia (poor vision in one eye), abnormal speech, vomiting, and
headache. Also experiencing vision problems, a 17-year-old New York girl
reported feeling dizzy and her vision went "black for a few seconds"
and she turned pale and lips turned purple and she also had fever and chills.
Similar to the DC girl, on July 18th immediately after being vaccinated, a
22-year-old Kentucky woman experienced slurred speech accompanied by pallor and
shock. On August 29th, two hours after being vaccinated, a 15-year-old New York
girl who had a history of asthma and was on four asthma medications experienced
difficulty swallowing prompting a visit to the emergency room. On August 17th,
15 minutes after being vaccinated, a 14-year-old Pennsylvania girl passed out in
the car on the way home.
Most of the reports do not describe what happened
as a result of the syncopal episode but a few do. One 11-year-old Florida girl
fell from the examining table and two Washington girls fell - a 16-year-old girl
fell and hit her head on a carpeted concrete surface and a 14-year-old girl fell
down and broke her nose.
Whether the 22 girls who experienced syncopal
episodes actually experienced atonic seizures cannot be determined from these
reports. Four girls, however, displayed observable seizure activity. The
11-year-old Florida girl who fell from the table also displayed "tonic
posturing." Tonic posturing is a type of seizure where sustained
contraction of muscles in the legs and arms occurs and consciousness is
impaired. The 16-year-old Washington girl who fell and hit her head on the floor
lost consciousness for one minute and displayed tonic posturing of her right
hand. Additionally, a 15-year-old girl from Virginia was described as having
"a mild seizure." In California, a 13-year-old girl was walking down
the hall after her vaccination, fell and had a 15-second tonic/clonic seizure.
Tonic/clonic seizures are also known as "grand mal" seizures.
Additionally, there were reports of dyskinesia
(difficulty or distortion in performing voluntary movements) and hypokinesia
(slow or diminished movement of the body musculature) both of which have
neurological implications.
Arthralgia, Joint Pain and Fever.
Arthralgia is defined as pain in the joints. Concerns about arthritis were
raised during the GARDASIL clinical trials. Reports of arthralgia in one or more
joints accompanied by fever were noted in five instances from four young girls
and women in Wisconsin, Texas and New York, and one 18-year-old New York male.
Guillain-Barre Syndrome.
Reports state that two recently vaccinated 16-year-old girls - one from Illinois
and the other from Mississippi - were diagnosed with Guillian-Barre Syndrome (GBS)
following vaccination with GARDASIL. In both cases, the onset of symptoms
occurred 13 days after vaccination. According to the National Institute for
Neurological Disorders and Stroke:
GBS is a serious disorder in which the body's
immune system attacks part of the peripheral nervous system. The first
symptoms of this disorder include varying degrees of weakness or tingling
sensations in the legs. In many instances, the weakness and abnormal
sensations spread to the arms and upper body. These symptoms can increase in
intensity until certain muscles cannot be used at all and, when severe, the
patient is almost totally paralyzed. … Vaccinations can trigger onset of GBS.[3]
The Illinois girl described earlier was
vaccinated on July 7th and symptoms were evident by July 20th. The girl also
experienced gait abnormalities (trouble walking properly), asthenia (weakness
without loss of strength), paresthesia (burning, prickling, tingling or numbness
sensation usually felt in the hands, arms, feet and legs), and hyperkinesia
(abnormal increase in muscle movement). The Mississippi girl was vaccinated on
July 31st and by August 13th she had increasing numbness and tingling in her
feet and hands and was subsequently evaluated by a neurologist and diagnosed
with GBS. The current health status of these girls is not known.
In both of these cases, the girls were also
vaccinated with Aventis Pasteur's Menactra, a vaccine for meningococcal
infections. Menactra has previously been associated with Guillain-Barre
Syndrome, and the FDA and others have issued alerts.
Other Adverse Reactions.
Additionally, a number of other reactions to GARDASIL are noted in VAERS reports
and they include: urticaria (hives); pruritus (itching); macular and papular
rashes; blisters and vesicles near the injection site; swollen arms;
lymphadenopathy (swollen lymph nodes); red, hot swollen knots at injection site;
burning, stabbing, severe and radiating pain at the injection site and in the
affected limb during and after injection; nausea and vomiting; infections and
skin ulcers, and other allergic reactions.
Other Considerations
GARDASIL is marketed as a
"cervical cancer vaccine" and intended to prevent infection with
specific HPVs - common viruses among sexually active women. It isn't clear what
benefits or potential harms could arise from vaccinating sexually active women
who have already contracted HPV. Of the 86 reaction reports filed with VAERS so
far, 12 reports were generated by young women 18 and older who were taking
hormonal contraceptives and presumably sexually active.
With respect to concerns related to vaccinating
women with known HPV infections, adverse reaction reports were filed on behalf
of a 17-year-old Texas girl who was already diagnosed with HPV and genital
warts. Similarly, the 22 year-old Kentucky woman who experienced slurred speech
following vaccination already had an abnormal pap smear with evidence of
cervical dysplasia.
Implications
The early reports of potential safety problems with GARDASIL raise
concerns and questions that need to be addressed by government regulators,
manufacturers and prescribing physicians. Specifically, the following concerns
need to be addressed:
- Syncope, seizures and Guillian-Barre
Syndrome have now been reported with hours to a week after GARDASIL
vaccination. GARDASIL manufacturer, Merck, should add these serious adverse
events to the product manufacturer insert.
- Considering that over 20 girls have
experienced syncopal episodes sometimes combined with seizures and serious
injuries, physicians should consider only giving GARDASIL when the patient
is safely laying down on the examining table. Because there seems to be
syncopal reactions up until 15 minutes after vaccination, patients should be
asked to lie down for 15 minutes after receipt of GARDASIL.
- The information provided by Merck indicates
that it is safe to administer GARDASIL with Hepatitis B vaccine. The
prescribing information states, "Results for clinical studies indicate
that GARDASIL may be administered concomitantly (at a separate injection
site) with hepatitis B vaccine (recombinant). Co-administration of GARDASIL
with other vaccines has not been studied." [4] Due to the small number
of girls aged 9 to 15 who appear to have been evaluated for GARDASIL safety
in Merck clinical trials (fewer than 2,000) and lack of publicly available
information about how many of these girls were given GARDASIL and hepatitis
B vaccine simultaneously, the safety of administering GARDASIL and hepatitis
B vaccine to all pre-adolescent girls is uncertain.[5]
- Aside from Hepatitis B, Merck does not state
that it is safe to simultaneously administer GARDASIL with any other
vaccine. Considering that there are ongoing evaluations of a reported
association between Menactra (meningococcal vaccine) and Guillain-Barre
Syndrome, and Merck does not explicitly indicate that it is safe to
administer to administer GARDASIL and Menactra simultaneously, consumers and
clinicians should question whether administering both GARDASIL and Menactra
at the same time is safe.
- Similarly, adverse reactions were
reported when GARDASIL was administered with eight other vaccines: Hepatitis
A, MNQ (?), MEN (Menactra), TD (Tetanus and Diptheria Toxoids), DPP (Diptheria/Pertussis/Polio),
PNC Prevnar (Heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate), DTaP (Diphtheria And
Tetanus Toxoids and Acellular Pertussis Vaccine), and TDAP (Tetanus,
Diptheria and Pertussis). Because Merck does not state that it is safe to
administer simultaneously GARDASIL with any vaccine other than Hepatitis B,
consumers and clinicians should question whether co-administration of
GARDASIL and other vaccines is safe.
- Most, if not all, of the reactions reported to
VAERS were in response to the first of the three doses of GARDASIL. The
Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Vaccine Information Sheet (VIS) developed
for HPV vaccine states that severe reactions include "any unusual
condition, such as a high fever or behavior changes. Signs of a serious
allergic reaction can include difficulty breathing, hoarseness or wheezing,
hives, paleness, weakness, a fast heart beat or dizziness." [6] The CDC
also states that "anyone who has ever had a life-threatening allergic
reaction to yeast, to any other component of HPV vaccine, or to a previous
dose of HPV vaccine should not get the vaccine." Which of the reactions
reported to VAERS constitute a "life-threatening allergic
reaction" and which, if any, of the children and young adults who
experienced reactions should receive additional doses of vaccine? At the
October 2006 ACIP meeting, CDC staff stated that only "three serious
reports were reported to VAERS after HPV vaccination in females 14 and 16
years of age. One of these patients had vasovagal syncope and was
hospitalized overnight for observation." [7]CDC's summary of the first
76 VAERS reports suggests that CDC doesn't regard the remaining reports as
"serious." CDC needs to clarify which of the reactions reported to
VAERS constitute contraindications to further vaccination with GARDASIL and
make this information available to the public and to prescribing physicians.
- What were the short and longer-term
outcomes for the individuals who experienced the reactions reported to VAERS?
Is there information available that would help to predict the
characteristics that predispose one to be at greatest risk of experiencing a
serious reaction?
- The CDC's Vaccine Information Sheet indicates
that allergy to yeast is a reason to avoid taking GARDASIL. Merck notes that
contraindications to the vaccine include "hypersensitivity to the
active substances or to any of the excipients of the vaccine. Individuals
who develop symptoms indicative of hypersensitivity after receiving a dose
of GARDASIL should not receive further doses of GARDASIL." The
prescribing information provided by Merck does not specifically note that
yeast allergy is a contraindication to taking GARDASIL. Government
regulators and the manufacturer need to address the discrepancy between
these documents and clarify the issues related to yeast allergy and make
this information readily available to the public and prescribing physicians.
- Additionally, Merck notes that vaccine
ingredients include 225 mcg of aluminum (as amorphous aluminum
hydroxyphosphate sulfate adjuvant), 0.78 mg of L-histidine, 50 mcg of
polysorbate 80, and 35 mcg of sodium borate. These ingredients are not
listed on the CDC's VIS sheet. The public needs this information so that
they can identify whether they have "hypersensitivities" to any of
the ingredients and whether they are at risk of experiencing a serious
allergic reaction. Hypersensitivities and known allergic reactions are
critical pieces of information that need to be communicated to prescribing
physicians in order to make the safest possible vaccination decisions.
Government regulators including the CDC and FDA,
in combination with Merck, should address the above safety concerns as soon as
possible. Medical groups advocating use of GARDASIL should effectively
communicate to physicians and patients the potential risks of using GARDASIL
along with precautions to improve the safety of patient care.
For more information about HPV infection,
GARDASIL vaccine and VAERS adverse event reports pertaining to GARDASIL, go to www.NVIC.org
[1] National Vaccine Information Center. VAERS
reports related to HPV4 vaccine http://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?PAGENO=2&PERPAGE=10&VAX=HPV4
(Accessed January 10, 2007).
[2] States reporting adverse reactions include: Arkansas (1), Arizona (3),
California (14), Colorado (1), District of Columbia (1), Florida (4), Georgia
(1), Illinois (2), Kansas (1), Kentucky (3), Massachusetts (4), Maine (1),
Missouri (1), North Carolina (4), New Jersey (2), New York (7), Pennsylvania
(4), Rhode Island (3), Tennessee (1), Texas (9), Virginia (1) and Washington
(4). State of residence was not identified in at least 14 cases.
[3]
National
Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. Guillain-Barre
Fact Sheet http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/gbs/detail_gbs.htm.
Accessed January 31, 2007.
| |
BARBARA LOE FISHER
SPEAKS OUT |
|
ABOUT BARBARA LOE FISHER
ARTICLES AND INTERVIEWS
CNN
Vaccinations....or Jail,
November 15,
2007
TODAY SHOW
Exemptions and Mandates, October 19, 2007
NPR- VERMONT EDITION
Vaccine Mandates, August 20, 2007
CHRISTIAN
BROADCASTING NETWORK
Are Vaccinations Safe for Your Kids? August 1, 2007
TODAY SHOW
Should HPV Vaccine Be Mandatory?
February 13, 2007
VACCINE, by Arthur Allen
January 5, 2007
MOTHERING MAGAZINE
In the Wake of Vaccines Sept/Oct 2004
THE BRIAN
LEHRER SHOW
Public Health vs Parents' Fears 10/9/03
INSIGHT MAGAZINE
Vaccines fueling autism epidemic? 6/9/03
CBS NEWS
THE EARLY SHOW, 12/04/02
THE DIANE REHM
SHOW
NPR, 11/13/02
INTERVIEW
WITH PAULA ZAHN
CNN, 02/25/02
INTERVIEW
NEW YORK TIMES MAG, 5/06/01
SHOULD PARENTS BE ALLOWED TO
OPT OUT OF VACCINATING THEIR KIDS?
INSIGHT, 4/24/2000
BUILDING
KNOWLEDGE AND TRUST
CHIROPEDIATRIC TIMES, AUG. 2001
AUDIO INTERVIEW
EMERGING WORLDS, 2001
SHOTS IN THE DARK
NEXT CITY, Summer 1999
TESTIMONY
7/14/2005
PROJECT BIOSHIELD
9/10/2003
SV40 AND CANCER
1/23/2002
CA SENATE ON IMMUNIZATION MANDATES
[MORE TESTIMONY]
STATEMENTS
4/11/08
VACCINE SAFETY
RESEARCH PRIORITIES: ENGAGING THE PUBLIC
02/23/07
20/20 RESPONSE
July 20, 2005
POWER OF TRUTH RALLY
8/23/04
SHARE VACCINE DATA- INSTITUTE
OF MEDICINE
6/26/02
ANTI-VACCINE WEBSITES
6/24/02
SMALLPOX VACCINE
PLAN
1/11/01
IOM IMMUNIZATION SAFETY COMMITTEE STATEMENT BY BARBARA LOE FISHER
[MORE TOPICS] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AUGUST 15, 2007
ANALYSIS SHOWS GREATER RISK
OF GBS REPORTS WHEN HPV VACCINE IS GIVEN WITH OTHER VACCINES
FEBRUARY 2 1, 2007
VACCINE SAFETY GROUP
RELEASES GARDASIL REACTION REPORT
FEBRUARY 1, 2007
HPV VACCINE MANDATES RISKY
AND EXPENSIVE
OCTOBER 31, 2006
STUDIES FAIL TO DEMONSTRATE
SAFETY OR EFFECTIVENESS OF INFLUENZA VACCINE IN CHILDREN OR ADULTS
OCTOBER 16, 2006
SAFETY ADVOCATES OPPOSE
PENTAGON'S RETURN TO MANDATORY ANTHRAX VACCINATION OF U.S. MILITARY
PERSONNEL
JUNE 27, 2006
MERCK'S GARDASIL NOT PROVEN SAFE FOR LITTLE GIRLS
NOVEMBER 15, 2005
CONGRESS SET TO BAIL OUT BIG PHARMA IN SECRET
OCTOBER 19, 2005
CONGRESS SET TO PASS LAW ELIMINATING LIABILITY FOR VACCINE INJURIES
JUNE 6, 2005
PRESIDENT BUSH SHOULD REMOVE MERCURY FROM VACCINES
APRIL 1, 2005
NVIC TEAMS UP WITH ANTHRAX
BAND
FEB 4, 2005
ANTI-TERROR BILL UNCONSTITUTIONAL
MAY 18, 2004
IOM PLAYED POLITICS IN REPORT ON AUTISM AND VACCINES
DECEMBER 10, 2003
GOVERNMENT AND INDUSTRY SHOULD RELEASE FLU VACCINE DATA
DECEMBER 8, 2003
VACCINE SAFETY ADVOCATES SUPPORT SENATOR'S RESOLUTION
[MORE PRESS
RELEASES]
|
|
NVIC CONFERENCES |
|
|